Recently, The Federalist published an article in which the author sincerely argued that two popular social movements – Black Lives Matter (BLM) and anti-abortion/pro-life activists – pursue a common goal: respecting and preserving life.
Christina Marie Bennett- a writer and pro-lifer who works with pregnant women in crisis environments for the benefit of both mother and child- is challenging the way pro-life advocates have responded, and should respond, to claims of police brutality, the growing frustrations in the black community and Black Lives Matter.
Specifically, Bennett laments the continued dismissal of Black Lives Matter activists and others by pro-lifers who readily cite black abortion rates when the issue of police brutality is raised. Bennett sees this practice as a kind of pro-life one-upmanship that minimizes the tragedy of lives “lost through [police] violence.”
For example, Bennett claims the “knee-jerk” response of, “If black lives matter, then why are your abortion rates so high?” deflects from the issue BLM supports. She says the response insinuates that black people don’t care about unborn black lives as much as adult black lives, which calls into question black concerns regarding what lives are more valuable. I’ll return to this point.
Rather than pitting one cause against another, Bennett believes that neither movement should be used to undermine the other because, in their respective ways, both campaigns are trying to safeguard human flourishing. For Bennett, both movements are solidly pro-life.
Bennett isn’t fully onboard with the Black Lives Matter agenda. She disagrees with the movement on several issues, including its support of killing pre-born black children. Honorably, she admits the difficulty of trying to empathize “with a movement that advocates for something I disagree with.” But for her, the resolution occurs when she sees “the movement for what it is,” which is “a broad group of people with varying levels of involvement, all trying to raise awareness and fight the specific issue of police brutality.”
This exercise in nuance permits her, as a pro-lifer, to winnow away the ongoing negativity that overshadows BLM’s agenda, freeing her to sustain solidarity with the movement’s pursuit of justice- a model she believes that all pro-lifers should follow.
Though I’m afraid I have to disagree, I am somewhat sympathetic to the author’s intent- dispelling the either/or nature of supporting BLM or being pro-life. However, I think some of the negativity she wants to minimize in favor of legitimizing BLM while maintaining fidelity to the pro-life cause, from the womb to the tomb (that part, I agree), misses a few essential points.
To begin, the phrase “black lives matter” is incongruent with the movement’s agenda. Black Lives Matter, as an ideological movement, is primarily concerned with police brutality and lethal force against blacks. It should, therefore, change its name to Black Americans Against Police Brutality or something similar to reflect this narrow focus rather than a name that suggests an all-encompassing concern for confronting problems that decrease the value of black lives.
Black Lives Matter is also a Marxist/socialist movement, funded by an admitted cultural destabilizer George Soros and other leftist organizations, which also calls the movement’s credibility into question.
Likewise, pro-life, as it relates to the preborn, is an exercise in proactivity. Life can’t be defended from police brutality if it’s prevented from being born. There’s a reason why people say that the most dangerous place for a black child is in its mother’s womb, and that painful admission is found in Bennett’s reflection on the more than 16 million black children killed by abortion since it was made a “right” in 1973. Increasing the black birth rate by decreasing abortion is an intrinsic good.
BLM, on the other hand, to the point that it’s pro-life, is deliberately reactive, not to mention misguided as to what saves lives.
Aside from supporting black abortion, the focus of BLM isn’t on the broken families and the chaotic home and neighborhood environments that create, nurture and underwrite the predictability of blacks in police confrontations that go south. BLM focuses on “systemic racism” that fosters “police brutality,” which is always initially or reflexively cited and deprived of evidence to support such allegations. When facts in respective cases are released, invalidating BLM’s racial narrative, BLM activists ignore them- up to and including the responsibility and contribution of the deceased to their death.
In other words, BLM’s definition of pro-life isn’t discouraging blacks from self-destructive behavior that increases the predictability of encountering police. Instead, they define pro-life as law enforcement officers refusing to use force against any black person/black suspect at any time, despite elevated levels of danger- including potential threats to personal or public safety. That’s racial solidarity, being pro-black, not necessarily pro-life.
Again, Bennett argues that abortion rates and police brutality deserve attention and shouldn’t be used against each other. I agree- each problem should be dealt with in proportion to its effects on black society. That said, there are obvious reasons the respective concerns are raised and used against the other.
One reason people, regardless of color, persist in highlighting the issue of black abortion percentages is that members and supporters of Black Lives Matter intentionally avoid discussing and confronting persistently high black abortion rates. This moral sidestep by BLM, over and over, proves to an increasing number of people that BLM isn’t concerned with preserving and redeeming black lives in any meaningful way because it refuses to protect the most defenseless members of the black community.
To the point, black abortion is specifically raised to gauge black integrity regarding conserving black lives.
It’s also mentioned because of the selectivity of the moral indignation that inevitably accompanies charges of “police brutality” against blacks, which is nonexistent when black abortion percentages are raised. Bennett confesses abortion destroys black children- more in any given year than all black deaths by law enforcement officers combined.
Blacks are only 13% percent of the population. Black women of childbearing age not incarcerated or suffering from physical/mental abilities that prevent pregnancy- in any given year- are only 3-4% of the population. Yet, according to the CDC, these women were responsible for 36% of all abortions between 2007 and 2010. Though this demonic act is specifically targeted at black and Hispanic women by white leftists, no one forces these women to kill their black preborn children, all of whom are unarmed. Morally wayward black men, sexually irresponsible back women, and blacks that refuse to condemn this unhealthy behavior are complicit in this genocide soundly.
The same CDC report said blacks accounted for almost 54% (16,738) of all abortions performed in Georgia (31,244 total), even though blacks are less than a third of the population. In Mississippi, between 1995 and 2010, blacks accounted for almost 72% (39,052) of all abortions while comprising 37% of the population.
In a 2012 New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene report, more black babies were killed by abortion (31,328) than were born (24,758) in New York City, totaling over 42% of all abortions performed. In 2010, 60% of all viable black pregnancies in New York City ended in abortion.
According to another pro-life organization, 870 black babies are aborted daily in the United States. The report re-emphasizes that more than 36 percent of all abortions in the U.S. are performed on black women. Yet, as day follows night, there’s no outrage.
Contrast that to the data that tracks police-involved fatalities from the Washington Post.
According to the Washington Post’s data- based on news reports, public records, social media, and other sources, as of 9:45 am Friday (10/21/2016), 772 people have been shot and killed by police this year (2016).
Of the 772 killed by police so far, 363 have been white, and 188 have been black. This unofficial statistic directly refutes any claims that the police are hunting, targeting, or killing blacks indiscriminately. More than blacks, almost twice as many whites have been shot and killed by police.
Of the 188 blacks killed, only 16 were unarmed when shot.
Now, of the sixteen unarmed blacks who were shot and killed by police, all but three either resisted arrest, refused orders of compliance and submission, attempted to flee, or attacked an officer.
Now we can all agree- life lost under these circumstances is unfortunate. But in reality, this sort of racial exaggeration–the false cries of ‘systemic racism,’ ‘racial injustice,’ and cops being ‘racist agents of the state’ by BLM and other racial justice warriors and activists over the killing of three unarmed blacks, is dishonest and disproportionate.
So, 870 black babies are killed daily, while only three unarmed blacks (who didn’t resist arrest) have been killed by police this year, which is why this issue is raised. Black Lives Matter claims to be against lethal force against unarmed blacks. What exactly is abortion if it’s not precisely that- deadly force used against an unarmed, defenseless black life?
The reality is that people correlate the level of black outrage to matters of black importance. Based upon that metric, the general public is convinced that blacks care more about blacks killed by (white) police officers than those killed in abortion clinics. Further, it’s been argued that blacks are apathetic regarding black children based on their proficiency at killing their unborn children.
Moreover, the raising of this issue has to do with moral priorities. There’s a moral distinction between those killed by abortion and those killed by police officers. Pre-born black children murdered by abortion are innocent; the overwhelming majority of blacks killed by police aren’t. (This isn’t to say that blacks that cops have killed deserved to die.) Innocent black children killed by abortion should, by definition, take priority over criminals, felons, and others who contributed to their deaths via the police by resisting arrest, attacking cops, or attempting to flee.
Again, I understand the necessity and obligation of being pro-life from birth until death. Still, BLM isn’t the vehicle to appropriate or sympathize with in pursuit of this noble objective.
The value of black life should be protected from the very beginning; as stated, BLM is against that.
Black children deserve a stable family environment that includes a mother and father, not a 70%-plus illegitimacy rate- born in tumultuous homes of single mothers and half-siblings from multi-sexual partnered relationships. President Obama said, “children who grow up without a father are five times more likely to live in poverty and commit a crime; nine times more likely to drop out of schools, and twenty times more likely to end up in prison. They are more likely to have behavioral problems, run away from home, or become teenage parents themselves.” Being pro-life means undoing this social dysfunction, reducing run-ins with the police, and reducing the chances of experiencing police brutality and death.
Black Lives Matter says nothing about that.
Being pro-life means black children deserve a quality education, which charter schools deliver, rather than inferior schooling because they’re black, poor, or both. BLM (and the NAACP) are adamantly against charter schools for black children in favor of the status quo that has deliberately undereducated and underserved black children for generations.
The anti-charter school stance of BLM (and the NAACP) has put these so-called civil rights groups at odds with most blacks. A recent study demonstrated that 82 percent of black parents with school-aged children enthusiastically support charter schools.
For the record, black students comprise 27 percent of enrollment in charter schools, compared to 16 percent of black enrollment in traditional public schools.
Black Lives Matter can say what it will about the dignity and worth of black lives. Still, until members and supporters of the movement start demonstrating that the totality of black lives matters to blacks first, black lives won’t matter to anyone else.
Being pro-life is commendable. Legitimizing Black Lives Matter isn’t.