A group of black clergy members recently delivered a letter to Hillary Clinton’s campaign headquarters in Brooklyn that expressed concern and frustration on several key social and economic issues.
Anticipating her win against Donald Trump, the open letter expressed their anxiety about how Clinton’s administration might address issues central to black Americans- high rates of abortion, the restriction of religious liberty, the increase of police brutality, and the lack of quality education and economic opportunities in black society.
The 25 signatories, self-identified Democrats and “Independents,” reminded Clinton of the importance of the black vote, and insisted Clinton not ignore the “69,000 black churches in the US.” They also demanded that Clinton “accord the Black Church the same respect that would be conferred on wealthy white donors.” The black faith leaders concluded the letter by requesting a meeting with her during her first 100 days in office to discuss these and other issues in more detail.
The ad hoc group of black clerics was led by Jacqueline C. Rivers- executive director of the Seymour Institute for Black Church and Policy Studies in Boston, and recently elected Bishop, Frank M. Reid III, former longtime senior pastor of Bethel A.M.E. Church in Baltimore, MD.
As representatives of the black church, the signatories should be commended for bringing attention to several important issues complicating the quality of life for too many black Americans.
However, this letter was counterproductive. Black clerics shouldn’t waste time trying to persuade another Democrat politician to take black concerns seriously. My criticism isn’t of these black religious leaders, but with the outsourcing of black responsibility and the preoccupation with government to solve the crises in black society.
This appeal is a waste of time if the cosigners plan to vote- or have already voted- for Hillary Clinton. They know who she is and what she’s about. Voting for her (and her party) contributes to the problems they want solved, compromising their integrity.
Moreover, there’s no way in this world- or the next- that Hillary Clinton or any Democrat is going to elevate the needs and concerns of black people with “white donors.” I get it- this was an attempt by black faith leaders to force Clinton into validating the existence of racial equality among Democrats. Problem is, the Democrats form the party of racial inequality and various other forms of disparity.
Further- and obvious to everyone, Democrats have deliberately taken the black vote for granted since black folk decided en masse to compliantly throw away their votes to the Democrats while asking for nothing respectable in return for their faithfulness.
Blacks have neither the financial nor political capital to demand they be considered equal to white donors (or any other demographic), let alone taken seriously when they do. Black voters haven’t earned that kind of respect. As a matter of fact, as a near-monolithic voting block, blacks don’t have the political respect of anyone, save themselves.
It’s why both political parties disregard black voters.
One party sees no obligation to earn black votes but still receives them; the other party observes black culpability in being snubbed, and its apparent acceptability, and simply doesn’t see a reason to bother. The letter’s lament about both political parties being indifferent to black problems is true, but it’s the fault of blacks alone.
More to the point, black religious leaders shouldn’t petition and plead with politicians to resolve black social and moral pathologies that can and must be primarily challenged by local churches in their respective communities. And to be certain, the majority of the issues raised in this correspondence are moral problems.
The missive’s full-throated condemnation of the devastating effects of abortion on black communities is spot-on. Describing the catastrophic impact of abortion in black communities and the disproportionate rates in which black women have abortions, the letter notes that, “Blacks account for roughly 38% of all abortions in the country though we represent only 13% of the population.” That’s racial extermination.
The letter also affirms that because people are “created in God’s image,” innocent human life deserves protection against the “deliberate destruction… in its most vulnerable state.”
Yet the cosigners question Clinton (and the inquiry has to be rhetorical considering the topic and whom they’re addressing) as to what her administration will do to mitigate the high numbers of black abortions. Hillary Clinton received an award named after racial eugenicist Margret Sanger- whom she claimed she “admires,” and is an enthusiastic supporter of abortion up to the point of birth. Her devotion to abortion is religious in nature. She ain’t changing.
Ecclesiastical members of the church are much better suited to confront the abortion issue not only because it’s a moral problem but because of their proximity to the problem. The women having these abortions are members of their local churches and religious institutions. Nothing forces blacks into sexual irresponsibility or to kill their children indiscriminately. The problem and solution of reducing high abortion rates comes down to black responsibility and moral redemption, and that starts with local church leaders flatly denouncing sexually-destructive behaviors- including using abortion as birth control- and encouraging productive ones; not government intervention.
The same goes for the disproportionately high black crime rates that encourage police presence in black neighborhoods. The delegates of black Christianity are correct in bringing attention to black criminality and delinquency- the “calamity” as they call it, but they sought action and resolution from the wrong person, the wrong party and the wrong vehicle.
Though effective policing and commensurate sentencing for criminality is needed, unless and until black people and black churches are deliberate and resolute in rebuking the plague of black hoodlums that are hell-bent on death and devastation, more blacks- including the innocent- will suffer the predictable consequences. The black church- and blacks in general- must reject the tradition of silence regarding this issue. Black silence condones the very community-destroying behaviors that these black Christian ambassadors are spotlighting.
Additionally, if blacks want to reduce the occurrences of lethal police encounters, black churches and community members must vociferously repudiate the thoughts and attitudes that cultivate black cultural disorders and criminal stereotypes that draw the eye and ire of law enforcement. Black churches would do well in reviving and emphasizing a religious temperament that includes family stability, fatherhood, self-respect, personal responsibility, respect for authority, and the love of self and neighbor to minimize black criminality and tension-filled police responses. Black churches need to maximize the gospel and other resources that are instrumental in changing lives and overcoming the negative aspects of black culture.
Blacks must control the things that are within our power to control. We must stop preserving the posture of weakness and helplessness and depending on politics to save us. Salvation is from God, not the government.
Finally, the letter’s uncertainties regarding the future of religious expression during a Clinton administration are sound. The “open contempt for religious freedom” exhibited by LGBT autocrats toward Christians who disagree with “[normalizing] immoral sexual behavior” should concern everyone. Though there’s the argument that the black church didn’t speak up sooner and louder regarding the homosexual revolution, I salute these faith leaders for rejecting the scheme of gay activists to appropriate the narrative and legacy of the black civil rights movement to regularize homosexuality, and for their willingness “for the sake of the gospel, to suffer the consequences” in maintaining faithfulness to biblical convictions.
But Democrats facilitated the cultural legitimization of radical homosexuality and ignored constitutional safeguards of religious freedom; recent history proves it.
It bears repeating. The issues raised by these black church leaders are significant. More blacks need to honestly confront what’s destroying black society, painful as it is. We need to honestly identify the defeatism in black society and confess the fact that we’re sabotaging ourselves. We need to reclaim the kind of self-determination, self-empowerment and dignity that our predecessors embraced.
People will resume taking us seriously only when we’ve proven that we take ourselves seriously.